The
experience of committing our mental resources to solving a problem can
be
extremely
engaging. The study of how people solve problems is the problem that
engages
me and is the major focus of my research.
One
of the questions that we try to answer is what determines problem difficulty.
One
method we use is to collect verbal protocols and time subjects' moves as
they
solve problems, obtaining detailed information about their solution processes
and
problem representations. Another approach has subjects solve problems while
performing
a concurrent working memory loading task. One of our findings in this
area
is that people's limited working memory capacity controls their ability
to think
about
problems and plan moves. We often test our conclusions be constructing
computer
models of the cognitive processes that we believe subjects use, and
comparing
the performance of the models with that of our human subjects solving
the
same problems.
Another
of our goals is to understand how people overcome difficulty by mobilizing
resources
and developing competence on a problem. We have observed that people
are
often very tentative and uncertain when initially working on a problem,
but then
exhibit
almost "expert" level performance toward the end. We have been investigating
this
sudden transition to see what knowledge or skill has been acquired that
much
of
what subjects learn during problem solving is learned without their being
able to
indicate
any awareness of the learning. We are currently trying to investigate how
this
occurs and what its limitations are.
A practical
question that emerges from the above research is what features of
problems
determine the skill transfer between problems. Another area of application
is
the study of how design problems can be solved. Along with collaborators
in
engineering,
I have begun to examine how problem-solving processes can be
emulated
by a computer. These represent some of the research issues that have
begun
to emerge from our attempts to understand human problem-solving.
. |