We are
currently running studies with infants anywhere between 5 and 22 months.
Here’s a
description of just a few of the experiments we’re doing right now with
different age groups.
6-month-olds: Infants prefer to look at people’s faces, rather than
simple geometric shapes. Is this
because they have experience interacting with people, or because faces are
inherently more interesting? To
try and answer this question, we’re asking whether infants also prefer to look
at the faces of imaginary animals.
7-month-olds: How
do infants begin to understand that words occur in a predictable order in
sentences? Why is it OK to say “the dog,” but not “dog the?” Can infants learn these types of rules
only for language or in a variety of different domains?
To answer these questions, we use a simple task. Infants are asked to look at a computer screen, where they
see a series of colored circles.
These circles all follow a particular pattern. Either the same color repeats itself, or it does not. For as long as children are interested
in watching these circles, they stay on the screen, so that children get as
much time to learn the pattern as they want.
After the infants have finished learning, they get to see circles with new
colors. Although the colors are
new, they follow the same pattern as the children have learned before. We want to see whether children are
interested in the new circles because they have a new color, or whether they
have figured out that the pattern is the same, and do not find the new colors
as interesting.
13-month-olds: How do infants begin to understand which sounds mean something
different? When they hear two people say the same word, can they understand
that even though the two people might sound quite different, they are referring
to the same object?
In this study we again use the computer to show infants different objects. Each object has its own unique
name. Once infants have learned
what the name of each object is, we present them with two kinds of test
trials. In one kind of trial, they
see the object with the name they have heard before. In another kind of test trial, they see the object, but hear
a slightly different name. For example,
if the object was called “bih” before, it might be called “dih” now. Our question is what kind of changes
infants notice, and what kind of changes infants ignore. Figuring out which changes to attend
to, and ignore, is an important part of discovering how their language works.
20-month-olds: When we talk to infants and young children (and
each other), we most often use sentences, rather than speaking in one word at a
time. This presents a challenge
for children, because to learn words, they need to be able to separate the
individual words from the stream of fluent speech.
One fact that might help infants, though, is
that many words refer to visual objects in the world (like the word “dog”
refers to four-legged pets that bark).
Consistently experiencing words that are paired with objects might make
the words in fluent speech easier to spot.
To see if children can take advantage of these kinds of audio-visual regularities, we present them with a stream of fluent speech, made up of novel words. For half of the infants, each of the novel words is paired with an object. The other half hears the speech with no objects. Does one group learn more easily?